Residents encouraged to have their say on proposed dual name for Russell Island


Redland City residents are being encouraged to have their say on a proposal to use the traditional indigenous name Canaipa Island to refer to Russell Island.

Division 5 Councillor for the Southern Moreton Bay Islands Mark Edwards said Minister for State Development Natural Resources and Mines Dr Anthony Lynham was inviting feedback on the proposal, which came following a request from Council last year.

“Changing the name of Russell Island back to its traditional indigenous name Canaipa Island has been a topic of discussion in the community for a number of years, so it is great the community now has the opportunity to have their say formally,” Cr Edwards said.

“The Bay Islands Chamber of Commerce actively engaged with the local community prior to approaching Redland City Council last year to ask for our in-principle support for the proposed name change.

“Council supported the community by writing to the State Government as the ultimate decision-makers, asking them to consider the request and I am pleased that they have responded by calling for submissions.

“The State proposal includes the two names, Russell and Canaipa Island, co-existing for a period of time to provide a seamless transition.

“All residents are encouraged to have their say on the proposal by 29 July 2015 by going to the Queensland Place Names section on the Department of Natural Resources and Mines website – www.dnrm.qld.gov.au.”

Cr Edwards said using the name Canaipa Island would acknowledge the island’s traditional owners, the Quandamooka People.

“The proposed name change will strengthen the Redlands’ acknowledgement of the region’s traditional owners, as well as adding to the island’s tourism appeal by highlighting its strong history and cultural connections,” he said. 

“There are already a number of references to Canaipa on the island and the Quandamooka People have always referred to the island as Canaipa Island, so this name in a sense is already being used.

“The Quandamooka People have been engaged regarding this proposal and they are supportive of the name change and have indicated if it were to proceed they would like to perform a traditional ceremony on Canaipa each year to acknowledge and celebrate the occasion.

“The exact meaning of Canaipa is reportedly derived from the Aboriginal word meaning place of ironbark spear.”

To make a submission to the Department of Natural Resources and Mines

Queensland place name plan QPN1271 shows the location of the place considered under the proposal and may be viewed at the Queensland Place Names section on the Department of Natural Resources and Mines website – www.dnrm.qld.gov.au .

Submissions in writing, either in support of or against the proposal, can be submitted online at www.dnrm.qld.gov.au or sent to Queensland Place Names, Level 9 Landcentre, Department of Natural Resources and Mines, GPO Box 2454, Brisbane Qld 4001.

Enquiries about the proposal should be directed to Department of Natural Resources and Mines.

3 thoughts on “Residents encouraged to have their say on proposed dual name for Russell Island

  1. Sam Delawarr

    the Caniapa name will achieve 2 main things …looses the taint of past scams and prejudices surrounding that land scam and the recent years that the SMBI ratings extortions and micro managing the island by the RCC to the point of social and property collapse .. Let a name change , bring about a moral and social responsibility to the ratepayers by also returning the islands to equal and just rates and infrastructure as the rest of RCC enjoys

    Reply
  2. Diana Cregan-Reid

    Re Councillor Edwards statement that the “The Bay Islands Chamber of Commerce actively engaged with the local community prior to approaching Redland City Council last year to ask for our in-principle support for the proposed name change.” is blatantly erroneous.

    No one I have spoken to, and certainly not ourselves as Russell Island residents and past business owners for 19 years, were aware that this proposal was ‘in the pipeline. Most of the people involved in this scheme do not even live on Russell Island.

    If the funds and energy being spent on this ridiculous proposal had been, and continued to be, put into positive aspects of cleaning up the Island (as far as streets, especially our main street), real estate agents dodgy actions, stopping undesirables spreading their junk, convincing Centrelink that the Islands are not the place for the already unemployed, and encouraging the media to not drag the past up again and again our Island land values would improve.
    This is the real crux of the proposal. A change of name will not change the ethos.

    Russell Island has a great and fascinating history in all its aspects. Let’s be proud of it. Their is only a stigma about a few measly years if you continue to bleat about it. It is actually our point of difference for every where else in the State. Let’s make it a positive!.
    DON’T MESS WITH RUSSELL. So many of us are proud of it.!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *